When I read this article, I had to laugh. It brought to mind a conversation I once had with my friend, Maina, a Kenyan living in the US. We were both attending an event organized by an African American student group. Some of the African American women attending the event were dressed in the best of African couture, but there was a distinct difference between the way they carried themselves and the way a Kenyan or Tanzanian woman dressed in a similar outfit would have carried herself. I put it down to the fact that the American women probably felt self-conscious in their dresses. Maina, who had lived in the country longer, had another theory. He figured that Americans didn’t know how to simply be. Everything they took up, every cultural practice or idea they picked up from another nation, they had to repackage, politicize and turn into a movement.
I shook my head in doubt, but Maina smiled. “Believe me,” he
said, “this lady in the Kitenge is probably wearing it to express political
solidarity with pan-Africanism. She’s not wearing it for the reasons our moms
or aunties would- because they liked the color or because the pattern flattered
their figures.” I never did ask the lady in the Kitenge why she was wearing the
dress. That would have been rude. But today, as I read this article on Digital
Journal, I have to admit to myself that there may have been something to
Maina’s words.The title of the piece is “Time magazine cover features boy,3, sucking on mother's nipple.” And here
is an excerpt from the article:
The cover of this week's Time truly shows a boy being breastfed by his mother, exposing some side-boob. Aram Grumet, 3, was asked to stand on a chair and place his mouth over his mother's breast, a practise familiar to mom Jamie Lynne Grumet. The Grumets employ attachment parenting in their household, described by Time as "extended breast-feeding, co-sleeping and 'baby wearing,' in which infants are physically attached to their parents by slings.
I come from a part of the world where women routinely
breastfeed their children. It is simply what they do. Most Kenyans,
female and
male alike, don’t give a second thought to a breastfeeding mother in the
room. I can't imagine a Kenyan photographer conceiving of breastfeeding
as a controversial subject, and going out of his way to have the mother
and child pose in a manner designed to provoke readers. It is true
that, in Kenya, some kids still breastfeed
occasionally beyond the age of 3. This is normal. They ultimately
outgrow it. It's not an issue that has to be politicized.
Apparently, a different order prevails some hours West of the Greenwich Meridian. Not only is the decision to breastfeed or not to breastfeed a political stance backed by ideology, but basic childrearing practices are also labeled with special terminology. America has already given us “helicopter parenting.” Make way for “attachment parenting,” “extended breast-feeding,” “co-sleeping,” and “baby wearing.”
Apparently, a different order prevails some hours West of the Greenwich Meridian. Not only is the decision to breastfeed or not to breastfeed a political stance backed by ideology, but basic childrearing practices are also labeled with special terminology. America has already given us “helicopter parenting.” Make way for “attachment parenting,” “extended breast-feeding,” “co-sleeping,” and “baby wearing.”
Seriously, it would never have occurred to women of my grandmother’s generation to come up with fancy names for these basic practices. Nor would it have occurred to them that, one day, parents would engage in battles over the legitimacy of their child-rearing ideologies in the comments sections of magazine articles and blogs on the Internet. I think Maina was right. Americans can be a tad bit too ideological about everyday matters.
This work is licensed to Rose Kahendi under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
No comments:
Post a Comment